Does the public have any meaningful participation in Tompkins County’s policies?
Is the county being run for the health and well-being of all the people?
Are the county’s policies formulated for long term sustainability, or short-term gain?
In each blog, I will focus on an actual incident or issue that raises questions about the conduct of those who have been entrusted with the welfare of the public at large.
The questions and facts of the case will be included in a letter sent to the persons responsible for regulatory oversight, as well as to our elected representatives. The body of the letter will be disclosed in each blog, and the results of these letters and the names of recipients will be posted as updates.
At the end of the series, I will summarize the findings as to whether the response of Tompkins County public officials has been consistent with their duty to protect the public at large.
Coming next week: Part 8a — Deadly Drift
