“The World According to Doctrine” — What’s good for the gander –

What’s good for the gander –

“What’s good for the goose is good for the gander” – refers to a concept of gender equality that is no longer permissible in modern Doctrinal Society. Acceptable behavior is set forth in law at a higher level: by people who refuse to reveal what they are giving, what they are taking, and how they are weighting the scales – or to have their decisions questioned.

“The World According to Doctrine” — “Using doesn’t define you: It empowers you.”

“Using doesn’t define you: It empowers you.”

“Doing unto others . . .” is just an out of date homily in this time of naked greed. People who distain menial jobs; have no problem taking from those who work them. And “compassion” is just a tool to shame those who have it; into giving to those who use it.

The only crimes left are not getting what you want — or someone not giving it to you.

“The World According to Doctrine” — Only men admit to being sexist

Only men admit to being sexist

Women always defend or excuse their sexist behavior. “Always sexist – always an excuse” is an amazingly accurate paradigm — but then, there’s no more room for truth in modern Doctrine than there is for gender equality.

“The World According to Doctrine” — “Why do people who disbelieve in religion . . ?”

“Why do people who disbelieve in religion . . ?”

You can knife five people to death at a party – and you’re not accountable. But if you have non-conforming beliefs – you’ve committed an unforgivable crime.

We’ve moved from “saints and sinners” to “users and losers” – and the self-serving Doctrine that facilitates an endless taking has no place for ethical or religious restrictions. A greed-driven media goes out of its way to link religious beliefs with everything bad – and promote a guillotine-crowd of targeting haters.

Welcome to a time where victims have been downgraded to complainants – and are just one politician away from a “not human beings” status. Embrace the feel-good conformity — and drive your electric car in climate change weather.

“The World According to Doctrine” — “If psychiatrists were accountable . . .”

“If psychiatrists were accountable . . .”

It’s a world of power – without accountability. Of authority – without oversight. Whether it’s the Girl Card, the Race Card, or the Official Card – it’s a game of bureaucracy that allows some players to play by a different set of rules. It’s a corruption that balances the books – and won’t allow any auditing.

“If you want to know the end, look at the beginning.” – African Proverb

It’s not going to end well.

“The World According to Doctrine” — “Ring in the changes – ring up the cash”

“Ring in the changes – ring up the cash”

It’s no longer change for change sake – it’s change for their sake. Every change in our changeable world is leveraged with behind-the-scenes levers: Your stocks go down – they profit. Your stocks go up – they profit. Every life, every death, every education, every disability, and every natural, unnatural, and financial disaster — is another opportunity to siphon off the cash. We’re living in a time of change: cha-ching.

“The World According to Doctrine” — “What’s more destructive than. . ?”

“What’s more destructive than. . ?”

Forget about the flooding of cities – and think about the floods of refugees. It’s Nano-bombs, not rising seas that will change the face of the planet. How ironic that emerging technologies; instead of saving us from the mistakes of old technologies, will deliver the coup de grâce. One world to grab in the tumult – and if they can’t have it: no one can.

“The World According to Doctrine” — “Politicians: subordinating our ecosystem”

“Politicians: subordinating our ecosystem”

I was speaking with someone who was blaming the attendees at the Climate Change Conference for the state of inaction. What will that person do? Nothing. In 2022: blaming someone else is enough. The doctrinal world is more “real” than the real world.

While those “blameless” ones have been assured of their place in line – politicians know it take’s money and connections to get past the rope.

Our childish population won’t need to hold their breath until they turn blue — it will be a naturally occurring phenomenon. So many lenses – so little lens cleaning.

“The World According to Doctrine” — “They’re so self-centered . . .”

“They’re so self-centered . . .”

What does analogy this add to the canon of “self-centeredness”? Possibly the notion that self-centeredness is never sufficient unto itself – it must reach out to take more. What happens when two “self-centers” collide? Will they become “we-centered”? If two black holes – emptying into other spaces – collide — will they be consumed with each other – and leave us alone? One mouth with two stomachs? The BOGO origin of parallel universes?