“The World According to Doctrine” — How to survive a crash – not prevent it

“The World According to Doctrine” — How to survive a crash – not prevent it

“Put your head between your knees and hope” is government’s answer to riding with an impaired driver – as their drunken progress brings us ever closer to the cliff’s edge.

Their refusal to enact Climate Change regulations that would affect industries; has resulted in Climate Change droughts, floods, and heat that has had an even greater effect on businesses – one that will continue to increase.

Millennials won’t get their hands dirty: they’re too perfect to do anything but blame.

Is there still time? Time before we crash, yes. Time to avert it, no. If having a fatal crash is the solution to repeated DUIs — we’ve found it.

“The World According to Doctrine” — Lies, damn lies, and Scientific Theories

“The World According to Doctrine” — Lies, damn lies, and Scientific Theories

“Scientists have long warned what our fossil fuel addiction will unleash” lectured António Guterres, secretary-general of the United Nations.

Oh, yes? For decades; scientists have not warned the people of the Climate Change precipice we were heading towards.

Anyone without long-term memory problems will remember that scientists talked of “naturally occurring cycles” and continued to cite the lack of convincing data to legitimize their scientific silence.

Career longevity and funding are the yin and yang of scientific life; and unwelcome theories are a poison in the body of the scientific community.

Do scientists have a better understanding of the world than the rest of us? You could say that: Scientific theories have the authority of law — and the accountability of an election promise. The robes of a judge; and the soul of a politician.

“The World According to Doctrine” — rISE OF THE eVil oNES – Averaging Extremes

“The World According to Doctrine” — rISE OF THE eVil oNES – Averaging Extremes

One of the most annoying trends in government handouts is the way they minimize the situation; instead of acknowledging the extent of the problem. In previous books I have written about the four layers of bureaucratic defense: 1) Discredit the source, 2) Discredit the facts, 3) Discredit the situation, and 4) It’s legal anyway. Decades of evidence and natural disasters have broken through to the third layer of “Climate Change” defense: but they’re still fighting it. And if our government won’t acknowledge the seriousness of the problem — how far away are they from implementing an effective solution.

“The World According to Doctrine” — Climate Change Remix

“The World According to Doctrine” — Climate Change Remix

I can’t say our extreme weather events of the past 12 months are the “New Normal” – because each of them is merely a nostalgic snapshot compared to what’s already been booked for us down the road.

Our Climate Change predictions are like those billboards that continuously update our national debt or the world’s population: interesting, informative, and totally ineffective in halting our progress towards the final excess.

In the meantime: at least a 3-month supply of food and water would be more prudent than the “3-days” that our government recommends — how many years are some of those blue tarps out there waiting for a roofer?

“The World According to Doctrine” — Global Warming: Science sees a thermometer

“The World According to Doctrine” — Global Warming: Science sees a thermometer

Even when Science is about people – it’s not for people: it’s a detached attitude that sees Global Warming as a matter of degrees – not disasters. It’s a perspective that elevates observation above compassion, or responsibility.

We’re cooking a pot of unsustainable policies; while Science monitors the safe temperature guidelines. How hot is it? Hot as Hell.

“The World According to Doctrine” — “If we can’t get together to combat it . . .”

“If we can’t get together to combat it . . .”

Looking past the carefully quantitative scenarios of our weathered future – we can glimpse the plummeting quality of life it will bring.

When whole sections of the earth become too hot, too drought afflicted, and too far under water for human habitation: how will we share what’s left.

Post-apocalyptic movies depict a family doing anything to survive — what happens when it becomes a billion families?

Our hot, greasy pan will be sizzling — just sprinkle the water and watch it dance!

“The World According to Doctrine” — You won’t save the Titanic by bailing

You won’t save the Titanic by bailing

A few years ago: it would have made me cry – but now, I just shake my head and laugh: electric cars. Electric cars will make no meaningful difference. Electric cars are what you do along with meaningful changes — not instead of.

Did you know that the Agricultural Sector in New York State and elsewhere is allowed any amount of open burning, and the unlimited use of smudge pots? And not only is Agriculture a significant user of fossil fuels – in states like New York: they are Fuel Tax Exempt – undercutting any regulatory attempts to curb their fossil fuel usage.

Methane emissions are driving Climate Change – and the Agricultural Sector is the largest producer of methane in the US – and the only sector where emissions are still increasing. And the farming methods being promoted by the USDA and Land Grant Colleges are the largest emitters of methane of all farming methods.

All the biggest producers are transitioning – from claiming Climate Change doesn’t exist: to claiming they’re doing something about it.

Climate Change is here to stay – and it’s already too big to get out the door. Drive happy!